----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<d5a5e815-3078-4000-90b1-58b2a2635ea3n@googlegroups.com> ef238d75
@REPLY:
<Pine.NEB.4.64.2309142230540.5510@panix3.panix.com> cbfef654
@REPLYADDR Whisky-dave <whisky.dave@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Whisky-dave
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<Pine.NEB.4.64.2309142230540.5510@panix3.panix.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<d5a5e815-3078-4000-90b1-58b2a2635ea3n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Thursday, 14 September 2023 at 23:33:27 UTC+1, danny burstein wrote:
> long time lurker here...
>
> One reason I`ve kept my (aging, but still adequate) Canon, err,
> something DSLR is that I can put polarizing filters on it.
Have you tried holding your polarizing filter in front of your
camera lens to try.
I planned to do that a few weeks ago to get the reflections from water/pond
reduced, but I haven;t yet managed to find my old polarizing
filter(s) but when I do... :-)
It did make me wonder how or if AI could be used to simulate
such a thing, but not sure how it could be done
for reducing reflections.
>
> Last time I closely looked into this, which by phone camera
> standards was a loooooong time ago, the digital phone
> cameras still couldn`t deal with these types of glare
> and reflection.
>
> (My specific issue is photograhing metallic nameplates
> on an outdoor memorial obelisk).
>
> Anyone know if there were any breakthroughs?
A breakthrough would be me finding my old filters :-)
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441