----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@reader2.panix.com> 465c4efd
@REPLY:
<d5a5e815-3078-4000-90b1-58b2a2635ea3n@googlegroups.com> ef238d75
@REPLYADDR danny burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 danny burstein
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@reader2.panix.com>
@RFC-References:
<Pine.NEB.4.64.2309142230540.5510@panix3.panix.com> <d5a5e815-3078-4000-90b1-58b2a2635ea3n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0000
@PID: nn/6.7.3
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
In <
d5a5e815-3078-4000-90b1-58b2a2635ea3n@googlegroups.com> Whisky-dave
<
whisky.dave@gmail.com> writes:
[snip]
>It did make me wonder how or if AI could be used to simulate such a thing,
>but not sure how it could be done
>for reducing reflections.
I can see (IswIdt) some ways in which image processing
of multiple, slightly different angle photos, could
be combined in sugh a way as to "figure out" what parts
of each image are "glare" and eliminate them. But I`m
not aware of any system available to The Great Unwashed
handles that.
Thanks
--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
--- nn/6.7.3
* Origin: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441