----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<3256b8f0-af08-4d01-a536-fbe2c826d48dn@googlegroups.com> 7dad47a6
@REPLY: <0mmNM.64952$vGnf.13008@fx15.ams1>
9612f168
@REPLYADDR RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 RichA
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References: <82fNM.64932$vGnf.52078@fx15.ams1>
15Od.942@fx43.iad> 2@dont-email.me> <0mmNM.64952$vGnf.13008@fx15.ams1>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<3256b8f0-af08-4d01-a536-fbe2c826d48dn@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Saturday, 16 September 2023 at 14:20:51 UTC-4, Alfred Molon wrote:
> Well, I just gave a try to Adobe Lightroom on my Samsung M52 phone
> (Antutu score 520000). I used 20MP RAW files.
>
> Seems that the processing speed is more than sufficient.
This must be pre-planned and fixed image modifications because the
idea of looking at a screen
on a phone and making judgments (maybe other than cropping) on what
an image needs seems
a bit far-fetched.
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441