----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: Hih7.82439@fx11.iad>
28f85b91
@REPLY:
<e1307e66-9be5-4994-a5de-027a62bf1cf8n@googlegroups.com> c4b3b88e
@REPLYADDR Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Alan Browne
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<e1307e66-9be5-4994-a5de-027a62bf1cf8n@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
Hih7.82439@fx11.iad>
@TZUTC: -0400
@PID: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X
10.14; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 2023-09-23 05:31, RichA wrote:
> Looking at camera batteries, is there any evidence of this? I
assume by improvement, they mean capacity per volume. Since batteries have
shrunk considerably in most cases since mirrorless small bodies replaced
larger DSLRs, it`s hard to tell. I guess you could weight them.
63% improvement in 10 years sounds like a lot but not implausible.
Note that power density is measured in both Wh/volume and Wh/mass
depending on what is important (often both) to the system.
--
"Markets can remain irrational longer than your can remain solvent."
- John Maynard Keynes.
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:102.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
* Origin: UsenetServer - www.usenetserver.com (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441