----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<673655a8-98df-46ac-9a7c-e6604143ba39n@googlegroups.com> e0660463
@REPLY: NSo2.17150@fx13.ams1>
5b8e5499
@REPLYADDR RichA <rander3128@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 RichA
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<663dbd6e-b62a-4508-8f55-8d732e770c8en@googlegroups.com> GHI6.119755@fx17.iad>
NSo2.17150@fx13.ams1>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<673655a8-98df-46ac-9a7c-e6604143ba39n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Wednesday, 27 September 2023 at 12:30:43 UTC-4, Alfred Molon wrote:
> Am 27.09.2023 um 02:00 schrieb Alan Browne:
> > On 2023-09-26 19:17, RichA wrote:
> >> But I`m probably wrong.
> >>
https://www.dpreview.com/news/3235833260/nikon-teases-a-mysterious-new-plena-len
s-coming-on-sept-27th
> >
> > I`m sure it will be very good.
> With 2um of DOF
> --
> Alfred Molon
>
> Olympus 4/3 and micro 4/3 cameras forum at
>
https://groups.io/g/myolympus
>
https://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site
It`s conservative and a bit out of left field. A 135mm, f/1.8.
135`s were popular in the 70`s and 80`s. There are (some of us counted)
over 100 brand names.
$2500 and it`s big for an f/1.8. I guess that`s the irony,
mirrorless cameras held out the promise of compactness, but in order to make
the most money,
mfg`s have been producing big, expensive lenses for enthusiasts.
https://petapixel.com/2023/09/26/nikkor-z-135mm-f-1-8-s-plena-lens-hands-on-buck
ets-of-beautiful-bokeh/
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441