----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<0cea444f-7081-4db1-b530-22d734569d35n@googlegroups.com> 6f5018fe
@REPLY:
<MPG.3efcf47f522d7652989df7@news.eternal-september.org> 92e85d07
@REPLYADDR maltby <anthcp@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 maltby
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<cb731bb3-b754-47ae-9769-f3c532b597d4n@googlegroups.com> <MPG.3efcf47f522d7652989df7@news.eternal-september.org>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<0cea444f-7081-4db1-b530-22d734569d35n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Thursday, June 22, 2023 at 2:21:18 AM UTC+9:30, Ralph Mowery wrote:
> In article <
cb731bb3-b754-47ae...@googlegroups.com>,
>
radioc...@gmail.com says...
> >
> > I am trying a 80m off center fed folded dipole.. It sounds
quiet and loads fairly well across the HF spectrum..
> > With lack of knowledge I am wondering if there is any reason
to climb this tree..
> > Hoping to hear your thoughts, 73s de Dave AA1A
> >
> >
> I know about the folded dipole and use an OCF dipole, but have not seen
> an OCF folded dipole. Can you describe it to me ?
>
> Ralph ku4pt
Don`t bother.... I would recommend symmetrical antennas only for HF
due as unsymmetrical antennas are susceptible to common mode currents
causing noise...
Anthony
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715 848 1042
4441 12000 5030/49 1081
SEEN-BY: 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441