----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<9515289a-8945-4f65-909a-3ad14bca6b5en@googlegroups.com> e878a4ab
@REPLY: <2h9bgih66qv0p8b01b447mebg6f1a4i12n@4ax.com>
557bd463
@REPLYADDR Gerald Kelleher
<kelleher.gerald@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Gerald Kelleher
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<1168549654.000805.185810@k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <06190f3e-9f70-4edf-9068-673d83a6e499n@googlegroups.com>
<2h9bgih66qv0p8b01b447mebg6f1a4i12n@4ax.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<9515289a-8945-4f65-909a-3ad14bca6b5en@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
This thread was built on from a discussion 16 years ago in order
to demonstrate that there is nothing new to counter the view that
certain supernova stars represent the emergence of a solar system rather
than the demise of a star.
https://esawebb.org/images/SN1987a-1/
Many of the features of our solar system such as the Kuiper belt
or Oort cloud retain signatures of a process that created the heavier
elements and even why water forms in specific areas of a solar system-
https://esawebb.org/news/weic2318/
Far too exciting as a prospect than contending with those with
notions that are meaningless in the face of the new telescope and what it
can do.
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441