----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<96902935-42a7-41ec-8425-592c57d075e7n@googlegroups.com> 44e37d7d
@REPLY:
<ec4095f8-0cae-4299-8b8a-87c89d9c97e9n@googlegroups.com> e8fdf291
@REPLYADDR Gerald Kelleher
<kelleher.gerald@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Gerald Kelleher
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<ec4095f8-0cae-4299-8b8a-87c89d9c97e9n@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<96902935-42a7-41ec-8425-592c57d075e7n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
Having always gone my own way with these things, especially SN1987a,
there is always room to see what is going on in the one area left in
investigative astronomy with stellar evolution.
https://news.ucsb.edu/2022/020668/star-survived-supernova
I pay no attention to those contributors here in this newsgroup who
can`t manage to handle observations, interpretations and conclusions based
on cyclical events that can be seen in contrast to evolutionary
sciences where the best that can be done is different snapshots of stellar
and solar evolution at different stages in their development.
Once again, research is far too slow in this area as it is in many others.
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441