----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<9ef9358d-bdd7-4bad-92ce-77a238052e8fn@googlegroups.com> f6acbe44
@REPLY:
<6da420d6-8a0f-453a-969b-103b4e5228e3n@googlegroups.com> 68570f8a
@REPLYADDR W <wsnell01@hotmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 W
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<6da420d6-8a0f-453a-969b-103b4e5228e3n@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<9ef9358d-bdd7-4bad-92ce-77a238052e8fn@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 12:02:45 AM UTC-4, RichA wrote:
> I guess there could be some energy impacted by an impactor, even
if the body isn`t really solid?
One could hit the asteroid multiple times in such a way as to
increase its spin rate and let centrifugal force throw off some of the
rubble.
Or launch some size-able mass from the Moon and send it on a
fly-by of the asteroid, altering the asteroid`s orbit slightly.
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441