----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<b2fe8a3f-2bbc-48b9-9ead-88b8fc92bac4n@googlegroups.com> efeadf60
@REPLY: <7kr5hi14ucns7mblkjkh6kukhi8bkoiorv@4ax.com>
3cf1c175
@REPLYADDR Mike Collins
<acridiniumester@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Mike Collins
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<6da420d6-8a0f-453a-969b-103b4e5228e3n@googlegroups.com> <7kr5hi14ucns7mblkjkh6kukhi8bkoiorv@4ax.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<b2fe8a3f-2bbc-48b9-9ead-88b8fc92bac4n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Tuesday, 26 September 2023 at 15:47:57 UTC+1, Chris L Peterson wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 21:02:43 -0700 (PDT), RichA <
rande...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >I guess there could be some energy impacted by an impactor,
even if the body isn`t really solid?
> The approach I think is coolest is to just explode a big tank of white
> or black powder onto one side and let radiation pressure move the
> body. Of course, that requires enough advance notice that a small
> nudge is all that is required. You could probably nuke most of the
> asteroids likely to cause us problems and turn them into harmless
> smaller pieces.
That assumes that the target asteroid is not spinning
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441