----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@gonzo.revmaps.no-ip.org>
aa7db9a9
@REPLY: <suhbhi5jtn0qhr1ka5t2eu5a503upt7u5o@4ax.com>
f1a9f578
@REPLYADDR Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Jasen Betts
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
1@gonzo.revmaps.no-ip.org>
@RFC-References:
<4822916c-b702-4cc5-9449-681b854c9507n@googlegroups.com> <33dc16e4-4a15-4d02-a703-5566b992500an@googlegroups.com>
<suhbhi5jtn0qhr1ka5t2eu5a503upt7u5o@4ax.com>
@TZUTC: -0000
@PID: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 2023-09-28, John Larkin <
jl@997PotHill.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:17:00 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
><
bloggs.fredbloggs.fred@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wednesday, September 27, 2023 at 5:52:15?PM UTC-4, a a wrote:
>>> Donald Trump and the Trump Organization were found liable for
persistently committing fraud by illegally inflating the value of his assets and
net worth.
>>>
>>> A New York judge ruled on Tuesday in state Attorney General
Letitia James? civil lawsuit of the former president that alleges Trump
inflated the value of his properties by as much as $2.2 billion to secure
better terms on bank loans and insurance.
>>>
>>> A trial is scheduled to begin as early as Monday, October 2,
to decide the penalties Trump will pay. James is seeking damages of
close to $250 million.
>>>
>>> Trump has sued to delay the trial, alleging Engoron and James
are ignoring a previous appeals court order to narrow the case.
>>
>>The judge already made a summary judgement against Trump for the
fraud charge, so that`s not subject to change by trial, it will take a
formal appeal, which are not trials. The remaining trial is gong to
consider banning Trump and his family from ever doing business in New York
again, and maybe some other things. Trump`s been sunk already. None of
this makes any difference to his followers.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> #CGTNAmerica
>
> Don`t we have the Constitutional right to trial by a jury of our
> peers?
Trumps most expert* legal counsel waived that, as did the D.A., and so
he got a bench trial instead. No doubt Trump is lying about that it`s
a matter of public record and has been for weeks but that`s not the
sort of detail that will silence him. It would be no surptise to me
if his dumber sycophants are singing the same tune, and here you are.
> The new politics is that judges and prosecutors, in many states, can
> launch multiple prosecutions, hundreds of felony charges, against the
> national candidates of other parties. That sounds bad to me.
The alternative is that running for office gives immunity to
prosecution. I can see how wealthy criminals would favour that
alternative. A two tier justice system where all are not equal.
Is that what you want?
(*) sarcasm.
--
Jasen.
?? Слава Українi
--- slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
* Origin: JJ`s own news server (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441