----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<5e60308f-f52b-4146-a6f3-35007bb90c30n@googlegroups.com> ad342fe9
@REPLY:
<281b9f71-7f06-41de-986c-d8a7e27d3d32n@googlegroups.com> efc23380
@REPLYADDR mitchr...@gmail.com
<mitchrae3323@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 mitchr...@gmail.com
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<281b9f71-7f06-41de-986c-d8a7e27d3d32n@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<5e60308f-f52b-4146-a6f3-35007bb90c30n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 11:21:32 AM UTC-7, Laurence Clark
Crossen wrote:
> He said the moving frame of reference can have only one clock.
> What was he hiding?
> If more than one clock is used in the moving frame, they go
out of synchronization with each other due to the LT.
> That is, the clocks within one IRF go out of sync with each other.
A frame has its own time. There can be other frame clocks around it to compare.
> Einstein`s third postulate
> W. Engelhardt
>
> On the Logical Inconsistency of the Special Theory of
> Relativity
> Stephen John Crothers
>
> Critical Comments on the Paper "On the Logical
> Inconsistency of the Special Theory of
> Relativity"
> Vladimir A. Leus
>
> Reply to "Critical Comments on the Paper `On
> the Logical Inconsistency of the Special Theory
> of Relativity`"
> Stephen J. Crothers
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441