----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<54eb93e5-8618-4f41-896a-de9453bc18c1n@googlegroups.com> a987500a
@REPLY:
<c8a66c24-5d43-4d09-b441-c7d657e09b68n@googlegroups.com> fa7027e0
@REPLYADDR Laurence Clark Crossen
<l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Laurence Clark Crossen
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<281b9f71-7f06-41de-986c-d8a7e27d3d32n@googlegroups.com> 98Pa.521485@fx03.ams4>
<c8a66c24-5d43-4d09-b441-c7d657e09b68n@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<54eb93e5-8618-4f41-896a-de9453bc18c1n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 6:00:36 AM UTC-7, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 September 2023 at 13:54:09 UTC+2, Richard Hachel wrote:
> > Le 30/09/2023 ? 09:56, "Paul B. Andersen" a ?crit :
> > > Den 29.09.2023 20:21, skrev Laurence Clark Crossen:
> > >> He said the moving frame of reference can have only one clock.
> > >> What was he hiding?
> > >> If more than one clock is used in the moving frame, they go out of
> > >> synchronization with each other due to the LT.
> > >> That is, the clocks within one IRF go out of sync with each other.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Nonsense.
> > >
> > >
https://paulba.no/pdf/Mutual time dilation.pdf
> > The primum movens of the theory of relativity is the notion of the
> > relativity of simultaneity.
> >
> > What is particularly astonishing is that all of humanity seems to have
> > missed this obvious fact.
> >
> > Physicists have understood very well one of the visible consequences
> > experimentally of this phenomenon
> Physicist has gedanken/fabricated, and the mumble of
> your idiot guru wasn`t even consistent.
I think this issue calls into question Einstein`s intelligence more
than it does the LT`s.
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441