----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<dbe5a994-8528-4c95-8a10-e9c1b7a794b4n@googlegroups.com> f69764b9
@REPLY:
<fc48efb1-d355-4755-a4f5-e739031d04a8n@googlegroups.com> 079f9892
@REPLYADDR Dono. <eggy20011951@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Dono.
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<281b9f71-7f06-41de-986c-d8a7e27d3d32n@googlegroups.com> <knpng6F44p4U2@mid.individual.net>
<fc48efb1-d355-4755-a4f5-e739031d04a8n@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<dbe5a994-8528-4c95-8a10-e9c1b7a794b4n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 1:01:19 PM UTC-7, Laurence Clark
Crossen wrote:
> On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:46:03 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
> > On 30-Sept-23 4:21 am, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
> > > He said the moving frame of reference can have only one clock.
> > > What was he hiding?
> > > If more than one clock is used in the moving frame, they
go out of synchronization with each other due to the LT.
> > > That is, the clocks within one IRF go out of sync with each other.
> > That is not what the Lorentz transform says. If in some frame, the
> > relatively moving clocks show a particular difference in times, they
> > continue to show that same difference in that frame. It does not change.
> >
> > Sylvia.
> Thank you. Then why did Einstein consider it necessary to forbid
more than one clock in the moving frame?
Dumbotron
There are two clocks in the moving frame, oe at each end of the moving rod.
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441