----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<184e9804-3ed0-482a-aebb-54d70c62675en@googlegroups.com> 1c47027b
@REPLY:
<dbe5a994-8528-4c95-8a10-e9c1b7a794b4n@googlegroups.com> f69764b9
@REPLYADDR Laurence Clark Crossen
<l.c.c.sirius@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Laurence Clark Crossen
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<281b9f71-7f06-41de-986c-d8a7e27d3d32n@googlegroups.com> <knpng6F44p4U2@mid.individual.net>
<fc48efb1-d355-4755-a4f5-e739031d04a8n@googlegroups.com> <dbe5a994-8528-4c95-8a10-e9c1b7a794b4n@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<184e9804-3ed0-482a-aebb-54d70c62675en@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 1:30:36 PM UTC-7, Dono. wrote:
> On Saturday, September 30, 2023 at 1:01:19 PM UTC-7, Laurence
Clark Crossen wrote:
> > On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:46:03 PM UTC-7, Sylvia Else wrote:
> > > On 30-Sept-23 4:21 am, Laurence Clark Crossen wrote:
> > > > He said the moving frame of reference can have only one clock.
> > > > What was he hiding?
> > > > If more than one clock is used in the moving frame,
they go out of synchronization with each other due to the LT.
> > > > That is, the clocks within one IRF go out of sync with each other.
> > > That is not what the Lorentz transform says. If in some frame, the
> > > relatively moving clocks show a particular difference in times, they
> > > continue to show that same difference in that frame. It does not change.
> > >
> > > Sylvia.
> > Thank you. Then why did Einstein consider it necessary to
forbid more than one clock in the moving frame?
> Dumbotron
>
> There are two clocks in the moving frame, oe at each end of the moving rod.
Not according to Einstein. I gave the quote of Einstein given by
Englehardt above.
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441