@MSGID: <82gtfipor29u67aibtmmu4l7c0dul3mo6k@4ax.com>
7458119f
@REPLY: <km7qlsFu9i0U2@mid.individual.net>
05965b63
@REPLYADDR Doctor Who <support@selnet.org>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Doctor Who
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<82gtfipor29u67aibtmmu4l7c0dul3mo6k@4ax.com>
@RFC-References:
<caa7d2c8-c539-4c8b-b756-b5f0023a8692n@googlegroups.com> <km7qlsFu9i0U2@mid.individual.net>
@TZUTC: 0200
@PID: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:33:32 +1000, Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid>
wrote:

>On 11-Sept-23 3:51 am, pnn calmagorod wrote:
>> 
>> 
 >> Senior NASA officials say the agency`s Space Launch System ? the
massive rocket designed to propel its ambitious Artemis program to establish
a moon base ? is "inaccessible," according to a report from the U.S.
Government Accountability Office.
>> 
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/09/07/world/nasa-gao-report-sls-moon-rocket-scn/ind
ex.html
>> 
>> Change or die https://www.propulsion-revolution.com/
>
>Unaffordable.
>
>And it`s specifically the SLS that is unaffordable, because it is 
>expensive beyond all reason, other than that the contractors have been 
>bleeding the tax payer dry.
>
>It says nothing about Musk`s efforts.
>
>Sylvia.
>

Musk will follow the same fate, as every other newtonian propulsion
rocket !

--- ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
 * Origin: A noiseless patient Spider (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441