@MSGID: EIy4.4202@fx48.iad> d093d955
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> df514e14
@REPLYADDR JF Mezei
<jfmezei.spamnot@vaxination.ca>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 JF Mezei
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<caa7d2c8-c539-4c8b-b756-b5f0023a8692n@googlegroups.com> <km7qlsFu9i0U2@mid.individual.net>
<82gtfipor29u67aibtmmu4l7c0dul3mo6k@4ax.com> 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-Message-ID: EIy4.4202@fx48.iad>
@TZUTC: -0400
@PID: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X
10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 2023-09-11 06:36, Alain Fournier wrote:

> You do understand that SpaceX is a very profitable company.

Isn`t Space Exploration Technologies Corp privately held company and
thus does not need to release financial statements?

Considering all the money being spent on Starlink and Starship, I doubt
that if financuial statements were released, they would show profit.
Am pretty confident their commercial launches do generate positive cash
flow when the customer is not SpaceX itself, but question whether that
cash inflow is greater than the amount of money being spent to so
Starlink and Starship.  (and subsidize Starlink subscribers).

 --- Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
 * Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441