----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<d815b389-c399-484e-ad3c-2f6463aa8851n@googlegroups.com> 602daefe
@REPLY: <marquisCEICHt.6Hp@netcom.com> 62bc8918
@REPLYADDR Jym Dyer <jym@econet.org>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Jym Dyer
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References: <28vs36$8a4@agate.berkeley.edu>
<marquisCEICHt.6Hp@netcom.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<d815b389-c399-484e-ad3c-2f6463aa8851n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Wednesday, October 6, 1993 at 8:32:16 PM UTC-7, Roger Marquis wrote:
> Leor, Why not put on a critical mass where it can make a difference? I
> don`t see any popular resistance to bicycles in Berkeley. A ride here is
> just preaching to the converted (convenient I suppose).
=v= Greetings from 30 years later, where bike lanes in Berkeley are attacked:
https://www.berkeleyside.org/2023/02/23/hopkins-bike-lane-project-north-berkeley
We "radical bike lobbyists" still need and ride Critical Mass (and
Bike Party, and ...).
< Jym >
P.S.:
https://radical-bike-lobby.groups.io/g/broadcast
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441