----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
af1b6839
@REPLY: <4KZRM.42306$UHH3.28661@fx45.iad>
51600733
@REPLYADDR Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Mitchell Holman
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<e0fc3b84-ca8c-4b5d-a72a-50023b37184bn@googlegroups.com> <344c4b95-8bc9-4797-bb85-19d071df8645n@googlegroups.com>
US27.1879222@fx01.ams4>
<6b58486e-8f97-45d6-8e19-a204043e1938n@googlegroups.com> TwR4.41971@fx46.iad> 4l28.481579@fx14.ams4>
<4KZRM.42306$UHH3.28661@fx45.iad>
@RFC-Message-ID:
@TZUTC: 0000
@PID: Xnews/5.04.25
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
Ron Dean <
rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote in news:4KZRM.42306$UHH3.28661
@fx45.iad:
> There`s theory as to where
> or how in a blind, mindless universe, information comes about, but the
> fact is, the naturalist are at a loss as to the
> origin of information. But, there is no known exception, information
> comes from mind and only
> from mind.
According to whom?
> I realize that for some people truth, empirical evidence or
> facts that conflict with their
> paradigm, their paradigm takes priority and overrides any and all facts.
> So, evidence of design
> hence a designer is unacceptable. However, there is nothing known that
> falsifies the existence of
> a designer/god.
Your theory doesn`t need to be
falsified, it needs to be proven.
Why haven`t you done that?
> So, all that remains is one`s disbelief in the existence
> of a designer which is based solely upon faith!
Disbelief doesn`t have a
burden of proof.
--- Xnews/5.04.25
* Origin: TDSOTF (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441