----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: <nR2cnTpexKP152b5nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
adf89791
@REPLY: <km17r8Ft2g6U1@mid.individual.net>
d720f464
@REPLYADDR bad sector <forgetski@INVALID.net>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 bad sector
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References: 1@paganini.bofh.team>
<B92cnYbUzJC2x2X5nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> 1@dont-email.me>
<O6OdnZ5bJfAXjmT5nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> m8Ke.58836@fx08.iad>
<GC6dnUc6pIPJn2b5nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <km0hp9Foth9U1@mid.individual.net> <op.2ayk5dmqa3w0dxdave@hodgins.homeip.net>
<km17r8Ft2g6U1@mid.individual.net>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<nR2cnTpexKP152b5nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
@TZUTC: -0400
@PID: Mozilla Thunderbird
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 9/8/23 14:35, Mike Easter wrote:
> David W. Hodgins wrote:
>> It does much
>> more than just replace initd, and does so in consistent logical ways.
>
> What is your `position` on the arguments completely separate from the
> init improvement; that many don`t like that systemd likes to take
> `control` of so many non-init responsibilities?
>
> I guess the systemd idea is that just like init, if systemd can do it
> `better`, then that should be just fine.
>
> However, it does make it progressively more difficult to `do without`
> systemd, since it is SO much more than an init.
The kernel has a sort of monolpoly in linuxland; nothing else should
ever be allowed to come close to that status or it will start dictating
to kernel development. That`s my view of it or of anything else with
like attributes (or aims), I use eight different web navigators.
--- Mozilla Thunderbird
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441