@MSGID:
<infinitesimal-20230701140112@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> 2c5d7826
@REPLY:
<elevators-20230701124153@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> b8ecbd24
@REPLYADDR Stefan Ram <ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Stefan Ram
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<infinitesimal-20230701140112@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
@RFC-References: 1@dont-email.me>
<b7da3d11-5bb0-4158-9f4d-f4dab12a8673n@googlegroups.com> 2@dont-email.me>
<elevators-20230701124153@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
@TZUTC: 0000
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
>                               So, it seems to me that for such
>gedanken-experiments one uses elevators of infinitesimal size!

  In cases where individuals reject the concept of an
  infinitely minute elevator size, it should be noted that for
  each measuring instrument`s sensitivity level, there exists
  a finite maximum height beyond which the device becomes
  unable to detect changes within the elevator`s interior.

  The traditional understanding of "infinitesimal" magnitude has
  since evolved within contemporary mathematical theory through the
  application of tangential functors, in which linear approximations
  have superseded conventional considerations of infinitesimal size.


--- FIDOGATE 5.12-ge4e8b94
 * Origin: Stefan Ram (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715 848 1042
4441 12000 5030/49 1081
SEEN-BY: 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441