----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet 055913f9
@REPLY: 2:341/234.1 63e93a9d
@PID: OpenXP/5.0.57 (Win32)
@CHRS: ASCII 1
@TZUTC: -0500
Hello Carlos!
AA>> How about, instead of trying to transliterate every emoji
AA>> or allowing them to be "??", display the emojis from Tg
AA>> as the cryptic hex that represents the UTF character?
CN> How about, instead of that, just display everything from
CN> TG as UTF-8?
How many BBS message systems even support UTF-8 today?
CN> ...except in echos in which some specific charset is
CN> commonly used or required, like CP866 in RU.*, etc., where
CN> transliteration may be more convenient.
It would need to be managed on an echo by echo basis that
supports UTF-8, I guess. On second thought I wouldn`t
necessarily want to see primarily ascii-based message areas
filled with untranslated U+HHHHH codes littering a message
--
../|ug
--- OpenXP 5.0.57
* Origin: tg_bbs->
https://t.me/joinchat/TWCQfOZqwwOmweR1 (2:221/1.58)
SEEN-BY: 203/0 221/1 6 360 280/464 292/854 301/1
341/66 234 423/81 460/58
SEEN-BY: 467/888 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40
5020/715 830 848 1042 4441
SEEN-BY: 5020/12000 5030/49 1081 5090/958
@PATH: 221/1 6 5020/1042 4441