----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: _Lv6.17767@fx12.iad>
b1b1b4eb
@REPLY:
<5a14d434-f12e-4c32-9adb-cfe9885aa841n@googlegroups.com> efa12857
@REPLYADDR Puckdropper <puckdropper@yahoo.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Puckdropper
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<5a14d434-f12e-4c32-9adb-cfe9885aa841n@googlegroups.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
_Lv6.17767@fx12.iad>
@TZUTC: 0000
@PID: Xnews/5.04.25
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
JayPique <
mwskaneateles@gmail.com> wrote in news:5a14d434-f12e-4c32-9adb-
cfe9885aa841n@googlegroups.com:
> Is a square square still square even if it`s not a Woodpeckers?
>
So you`ve got square^square and you`re asking if it`s equal to square?
No, unless you call the square root symbol a woodpecker--I guess you can
kinda see a beak if you look at the right angle...
So yes,
square=woodpecker(square^square)
So in answer to your question, I have proven empirically that a square
square isn`t a square unless a woodpecker is involved.
Puckdropper, allegedly
--- Xnews/5.04.25
* Origin: Your Company (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441