@MSGID: <iqvbgi54g73ouiisb644s65c11qjc88vm3@4ax.com>
f90941a3
@REPLY:
<9515289a-8945-4f65-909a-3ad14bca6b5en@googlegroups.com> e878a4ab
@REPLYADDR Chris L Peterson
<clp@alumni.caltech.edu>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Chris L Peterson
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<iqvbgi54g73ouiisb644s65c11qjc88vm3@4ax.com>
@RFC-References:
<1168549654.000805.185810@k58g2000hse.googlegroups.com> <06190f3e-9f70-4edf-9068-673d83a6e499n@googlegroups.com>
<2h9bgih66qv0p8b01b447mebg6f1a4i12n@4ax.com> <9515289a-8945-4f65-909a-3ad14bca6b5en@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0600
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Sat, 16 Sep 2023 08:19:33 -0700 (PDT), Gerald Kelleher
<kelleher.gerald@gmail.com> wrote:

 >This thread was built on from a discussion 16 years ago in order
to demonstrate that there is nothing new to counter the view that
certain supernova stars represent the emergence of a solar system rather
than the demise of a star.

Because there was nothing old to support that view. It is loony toons
at its finest..
--- Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
 * Origin: Forte - www.forteinc.com (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441