----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: <lkl6hi9eag0ap35vckovcpms79j8puug1f@4ax.com>
bdac7ca0
@REPLY:
<dbeb2785-fbbb-4881-af59-76677e3d2e4cn@googlegroups.com> a108251b
@REPLYADDR Chris L Peterson
<clp@alumni.caltech.edu>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Chris L Peterson
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<lkl6hi9eag0ap35vckovcpms79j8puug1f@4ax.com>
@RFC-References:
<03b3a75f-27a2-487e-a8ef-1a9c47bc712fn@googlegroups.com> <fev0hido1s5tr671djedilthpha8acg7h2@4ax.com>
<44fc5aa3-3556-4a55-a617-4bfee0f184fcn@googlegroups.com> <s0n5hi56c60fobmrij39ian7pfa1bblqks@4ax.com>
<1bc5bc4d-2dd7-4c3d-9f97-495d5293868dn@googlegroups.com> <rdr5hihvauikqi3aq1dqatdgeod1m5l8n5@4ax.com>
<a358d51a-3c2f-4d50-81d8-fc63cd34700bn@googlegroups.com> <bv26hidrmhe4v3ie01mlc4q3294kc0d6i2@4ax.com>
<dbeb2785-fbbb-4881-af59-76677e3d2e4cn@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0600
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:26:40 -0700 (PDT), W <
wsnell01@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 12:51:18?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:15:30 -0700 (PDT), W <
wsne...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:45:19?AM UTC-4, Chris L
Peterson wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT), W <
wsne...@hotmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris L
Peterson wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <
wsne...@hotmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4, Chris
L Peterson wrote:
>> >> >> >> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA
<
rande...@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot
politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
>> >> >> >> No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs require the same
>> >> >> >> batteries.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable
parts warm enough.
>> >> >> The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They
>> >> >> simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an
>> >> >> environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan
>> >> >> that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
>> >> >> problem.
>> >> >
>> >> >Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can wreck
almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
>> >> >
>> >> >There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to keep
other vulnerable parts warm enough.
>> >> As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold damages
>> >> very little. There was almost certainly nothing in the craft that
>> >> would sustain permanent damage from those temperatures.
>> >
>> >As ALWAYS you have no idea what you are talking about!
>> >
>> >The Indian lander is no longer working. It used batteries and solar.
>> >
>> >The Chinese equipment DID have radioisotope energy and survived
the lunar night because of that.
>> >
>> >You inability to use logic is quite evident. Your inability to
understand facts is even more evident.
>> It wasn`t intended to survive the night. By design.
>
>You just used circular reasoning. That is to be expected from you.
You don`t know what circular reasoning is, either.
--- Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
* Origin: Forte - www.forteinc.com (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441