----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID:
<7b2080cf-3b99-4945-a532-ca2a186f11e8n@googlegroups.com> 2dd1ee7e
@REPLY: <lkl6hi9eag0ap35vckovcpms79j8puug1f@4ax.com>
bdac7ca0
@REPLYADDR W <wsnell01@hotmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 W
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<03b3a75f-27a2-487e-a8ef-1a9c47bc712fn@googlegroups.com> <fev0hido1s5tr671djedilthpha8acg7h2@4ax.com>
<44fc5aa3-3556-4a55-a617-4bfee0f184fcn@googlegroups.com> <s0n5hi56c60fobmrij39ian7pfa1bblqks@4ax.com>
<1bc5bc4d-2dd7-4c3d-9f97-495d5293868dn@googlegroups.com> <rdr5hihvauikqi3aq1dqatdgeod1m5l8n5@4ax.com>
<a358d51a-3c2f-4d50-81d8-fc63cd34700bn@googlegroups.com> <bv26hidrmhe4v3ie01mlc4q3294kc0d6i2@4ax.com>
<dbeb2785-fbbb-4881-af59-76677e3d2e4cn@googlegroups.com> <lkl6hi9eag0ap35vckovcpms79j8puug1f@4ax.com>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<7b2080cf-3b99-4945-a532-ca2a186f11e8n@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 6:09:51 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:26:40 -0700 (PDT), W <
wsne...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> >On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 12:51:18?PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
> >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 08:15:30 -0700 (PDT), W <
wsne...@hotmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 10:45:19?AM UTC-4, Chris L
Peterson wrote:
> >> >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 07:15:29 -0700 (PDT), W <
wsne...@hotmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 9:28:32?AM UTC-4, Chris
L Peterson wrote:
> >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2023 05:54:07 -0700 (PDT), W <
wsne...@hotmail.com>
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Sunday, September 24, 2023 at 2:20:31?PM UTC-4,
Chris L Peterson wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:10:40 -0700 (PDT), RichA
<
rande...@gmail.com>
> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >India has lots of plutonium. Canadian idiot
politicians saw to that. Too bad no RTGs...
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-66893924
> >> >> >> >> No reason the panels should be a problem. And RTGs
require the same
> >> >> >> >> batteries.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >The RTGs would keep the batteries and other vulnerable
parts warm enough.
> >> >> >> The sort of batteries used these days are not damaged by cold. They
> >> >> >> simply become inefficient at delivering power when cold. So in an
> >> >> >> environment where they will naturally warm again, and a mission plan
> >> >> >> that does not require major operations in the cold, there is no
> >> >> >> problem.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Nope. The temps encountered during the lunar night can
wreck almost anything, including "the sort of batteries used these days."
> >> >> >
> >> >> >There will not be enough "juice" in the batteries to
keep other vulnerable parts warm enough.
> >> >> As usual you have no idea what you are talking about. Cold damages
> >> >> very little. There was almost certainly nothing in the craft that
> >> >> would sustain permanent damage from those temperatures.
> >> >
> >> >As ALWAYS you have no idea what you are talking about!
> >> >
> >> >The Indian lander is no longer working. It used batteries and solar.
> >> >
> >> >The Chinese equipment DID have radioisotope energy and
survived the lunar night because of that.
> >> >
> >> >You inability to use logic is quite evident. Your inability
to understand facts is even more evident.
> >> It wasn`t intended to survive the night. By design.
> >
> >You just used circular reasoning. That is to be expected from you.
> You don`t know what circular reasoning is, either.
I recognize that you are using circular reasoning. You are unaware
of what you are doing.
--- G2/1.0
* Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441