----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 51167771
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 99b6ea0d
@REPLYADDR Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Mikko
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: 3@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me> 2@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: 0300
@PID: Unison/2.2
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 2023-08-18 14:18:55 +0000, olcott said:
> *Thus you agree with this*
> D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 06.
I`m mot sure it is correct English to use "D" as a subject to an active
verb "reach" as D is not present and therefore cannot actively do anything.
Anyway, one can say that H cannot correctly simulate D(D) past line 6,
which apparently is what you try to express with that sentence.
Mikko
--- Unison/2.2
* Origin: - (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715 848
1042 4441 12000 5030/49 1081
SEEN-BY: 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441