----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: 1@dont-email.me> 9ddd96ce
@REPLY: 1@dont-email.me> 33a0bbee
@REPLYADDR Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Mikko
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID: 1@dont-email.me>
@RFC-References: 3@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me> 2@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me>
1@dont-email.me> 1@dont-email.me>
@TZUTC: 0300
@PID: Unison/2.2
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On 2023-08-18 15:48:09 +0000, olcott said:
> The behavior of D(D) directly executed in main() does *NOT*
> provide the behavior of the actual input to H(D,D).
Of course not. The actual input to H(D,D) is just a text string
that has no behaviour. It can be interpreted to specify a behaviour
but it iself does not behave.
The actual behaviour of D(D) is merely a reference for determination
of the orrectness of the answer given by H(D,D).
Mikko
--- Unison/2.2
* Origin: - (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715 848
1042 4441 12000 5030/49 1081
SEEN-BY: 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441