@MSGID:
<ee1322af-3610-457b-8b11-97e0a6f460bdn@googlegroups.com> eb10d81c
@REPLY: <1qhtbrd.1u9dqckf8lo7wN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
98ed245b
@REPLYADDR Ross Finlayson
<ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 Ross Finlayson
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-References:
<caf3baf8-2782-4a9a-a75e-88fcc40386d9n@googlegroups.com> <1qhtbrd.1u9dqckf8lo7wN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
@RFC-Message-ID:
<ee1322af-3610-457b-8b11-97e0a6f460bdn@googlegroups.com>
@TZUTC: -0700
@PID: G2/1.0
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 2:42:02 AM UTC-7, J. J. Lodder wrote:
> PengKuan Em <tita...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> 
> > Abstract: The Lorentz force law is fundamental for electromagnetism. 
> > However, it is known long ago that the Lorentz forces between two current 
> > elements do not respect the Newton`s third law.
> [first error, snip] 
> 
> What is the Lagrangian for your theory? 
> 
> Jan

There`s draw, ....
--- G2/1.0
 * Origin: usenet.network (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441