----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@MSGID: <r3d7hi93a9fgu84aio9q503c12rg5i2ii1@4ax.com>
8a5556fa
@REPLY: noZ7.89017@fx13.iad>
9ec79e6f
@REPLYADDR jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
@REPLYTO 2:5075/128 jillery
@CHRS: CP866 2
@RFC: 1 0
@RFC-Message-ID:
<r3d7hi93a9fgu84aio9q503c12rg5i2ii1@4ax.com>
@RFC-References:
<4qikfitgbpa8l8r0o476j33j9clnib9ema@4ax.com> <71bdbeeb-51ca-47cd-8b8f-36653e3ca589n@googlegroups.com>
<e52f745d-dc28-4a4b-9950-664343987c9fn@googlegroups.com> <uc6mfitd2385bvmo27u140t4m40gsvccgo@4ax.com>
<c2a332df-9a62-487a-8e0a-64107456009cn@googlegroups.com> <sv1ofi92pfcps8bcjspmjmtpk6jspv4tgi@4ax.com>
wO91.10581@fx39.iad> 3@dont-email.me> <%SGPM.118812$bmw6.80662@fx10.iad>
3@dont-email.me> noZ7.89017@fx13.iad>
@TZUTC: -0400
@PID: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
@TID: FIDOGATE-5.12-ge4e8b94
On Mon, 25 Sep 2023 15:45:44 -0400, Ron Dean
<
rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
>Mark Isaak wrote:
>> On 9/23/23 12:19 PM, Ron Dean wrote:
>>> Mark Isaak wrote:
>>>> On 9/22/23 4:47 PM, Ron Dean wrote:
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>> What do you really know about bat evolution? IOW what has been
>>>>> observed from the fossil record? Is there any known or observed
>>>>> intermediate sequence of fossils?
>>>>
>>>> Yes. Not for bats, but for others, including equines, clams, whales,
>>>> titanotheres, and hominids.
>>>>
>>>> The real question is, what are you going to do about it?
>>> >
>>> To earn my degree, I went to the local university for 6 years. During
>>> this time, I began to question religion, doubt god and I saw evolution
>>> as likely, because of its reasoning, evidence and because scientist
>>> accepted random mutations and natural selection as fact. So, who was I
>>> to question the truth of evolution? But later a friend during an
>>> exchange, of ideas challenged me to read a book by a
>>> Dr. Michael Denton a microbiologist and an MD, entitled "Evolution, a
>>> Theory in Crisis".
>>> I read the book, and this was a turning point for me. I realized that
>>> where there is a difference, to know only one side of an issue is
>>> allowing oneself to be brain-washed.
>>>
>>>> 1) Examine those fossils, and if they appear genuine, change your
>>>> worldview.
>>> >
>>> I have, it`s my contention that after Darwin, people who accepted
>>> Darwin`s view then set as a goal to find evidence which could be used
>>> to demonstrate the reality of evolution. By this method one can
>>> "prove" anything.
>>
>> Except the support for evolution comes from at least half a dozen very
>> different and independent directions.
>>
>>>> 2) Ignore them for so long that you can again pretend they don`t exist.
>>> >
>>> Point, is intermediate fossils are few and far in between.
>>
>> But there are more than enough to disprove creationism.
> >
>Why your obsession with creationism? It`s not the same as ID.
>>
>>>> 3) Something else:
>>>>
>>> Yes! Have you read anything from a ID est legitimate material by and
>>> ID est, rather than a critique of ID?
>>
>> Yes, of course. Not only read it, but thought about it. Do you agree
>> with ID theorists you refer to that one of the creator gods is evil?
>>
>Intelligent design is strictly about the evidence of design, it`s
>nothing about gods good or evil.
>This proves to me, that you`ve been brain washed and one sided
>misinformation, since everything you wrote is not from any legiminate
>intelligent design source.
Incorrect. ID is strictly about a claim that function comes only from
intelligence. Not sure how you *still* don`t understand this.
--
To know less than we don`t know is the nature of most knowledge
--- ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
* Origin: What are you looking for? (2:5075/128)
SEEN-BY: 5001/100 5005/49 5015/255 5019/40 5020/715
848 1042 4441 12000
SEEN-BY: 5030/49 1081 5058/104 5075/128
@PATH: 5075/128 5020/1042 4441